Amazon rejects a 2-star review based on – what guideline exactly? Christian Donner, January 7, 2019January 7, 2019 From: Amazon Reviews <no-reply@amazon.com> Subject: Your review of GRANDOE Men’s OAKBROOK Genu… could not be posted to Amazon.com Thank you for submitting a customer review. Thank you for submitting a customer review on Amazon. After carefully reviewing your submission, your review could not be posted to the website. While we appreciate your time and comments, reviews must adhere to the following guidelines: http://www.amazon.com/review-guidelines from Trailman on January 5, 2019 FrankenfingersI have had no luck with buying winter gloves on Amazon, and these ones are no exception. I wear ski gloves, motorcycle gloves, work gloves – never a problem with fit. These gloves, however, are made for frankenfingers. They do not run small. They are about .5 to 1 inch too long. The thumb and the back of the hand fit fine. Just the 4 fingers have too much empty space in the front. There are gloves for sale here where reviewers reported frankenthumbs. With these gloves, the thumb fits fine. A smaller size would not have fit me at all, because they are a bit tight to get into.Other things to note: the label says “Brooks Brothers”, the country of origin is China, not India, as advertised. And please note that only the CUFF is fur – the inside liner is polyester, a not so small detail that I missed. I suppose that these gloves are “overstock” or returned gloves that BB cannot sell because of the fit issues.Overall verdict: a pair of medium quality gloves at a much too high price point with poor fit. First photo included in the review 2nd photo included in the review Related Posts:Amazon threatens customer of 26 yearsThe Great Cat Litter Poop OffSUTAB Scam?TyreWiz not working after battery change Web AmazonReviews